Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
Letter to the Editor
Media and News
Notice of Retraction
Original Article
Review Article
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
Letter to the Editor
Media and News
Notice of Retraction
Original Article
Review Article
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
Letter to the Editor
Media and News
Notice of Retraction
Original Article
Review Article
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
4 (
2
); 67-73
doi:
10.25259/MEDINDIA_6_2024

Assessment of quality of life and effect of counseling on psychosocial development of children with congenital anomalies undergoing multiple corrective surgeries: An outpatient-based retrospective cohort study

Department of Paediatric Surgery, Command Hospital, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Command Hospital Western Command, Chandi Mandir, Haryana, India
151 Base Hospital, Guwahati, Assam, India
Department of Medicine, Military Hospital, Military Hospital Namkum, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India
Author image

*Corresponding author: Ankit Kumar, Department of Medicine, Military Hospital, Namkum, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India. ankit1992afmc@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Khanna SK, Khanna N, Sharma M, Kumar A. Assessment of quality of life and effect of counseling on psychosocial development of children with congenital anomalies undergoing multiple corrective surgeries: An outpatient-based retrospective cohort study. Med India. 2025;4:67-73. doi: 10.25259/MEDINDIA_6_2024

Abstract

Objectives:

To assess the long-term quality of life of family members of paediatric patients with congenital anomalies undergoing multiple corrective surgeries and to identify the factors associated with better outcomes.

Materials and Methods:

This study is an outpatient-based based retrospective, record-based cohort study carried out at two tertiary care centres of northern India from 2020 to 2021. The cohort of patients who were followed from 2011 to 2021 at these centres was included. Patients of 5 to 12 years of age with congenital anomalies undergoing multiple corrective surgeries (>5) with their families attending the paediatric surgery OPD were included. A questionnaire derived from the Childhood Behaviour Checklist and the Paediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) was used to evaluate psychosocial comorbidities.

Results:

The mean age of the patients was 9.5 (± 1.5) years, with female preponderance (54.75%). The commonest psycho-social problem encountered among the patients was behavioural problems, followed by increased screen time among the children. Factors associated with better psychosocial adaptation and lower problems includes adequate counselling (>4), lesser number of surgeries (i.e. <10), early age of psycho-therapeutic interventions in form of counselling (i.e. between 5-7 years), less hospital visits (<10 per year) and neural tube defects & hydrocephalus as compared to other anomalies (GIT and GUT).

Conclusion:

Multiple corrective surgeries are associated with significant psycho-social problems in these children and their families. Adequate counselling beginning in the early age group for these patients is associated with better psycho-social adaptation.

Keywords

Behavioural Problems
Congenital anomalies
Corrective surgeries
Counseling
Quality of Life

INTRODUCTION

During a child’s early years, hospitalization and surgical operations requiring anesthesia have a profound psychological and emotional impact on their mental health.[1,2] These experiences can manifest emotionally, behaviorally, or physically as nervousness, fear, anger, guilt, rage, or pain.[3,4] The impact of surgery, its complications, and multiple hospital visits significantly affects the quality of life (QoL) of pediatric patients. Management of psychosocial problems is not an integral part of the treatment of such children; thus, we realized that it is important to assess the QoL of not only the pediatric patient but also their carer and siblings.[5]

Families with patients with congenital anomalies such as neural tube defects and gastrointestinal and genitourinary anomalies have to visit the hospital multiple times. It could be related to surgery, a daycare procedure, or follow-up, investigations, repeated hospitalizations for scheduled procedures, or their consequences, all of which substantially impact the child’s psychosocial development.[3,4,6] This amounts to a huge psychosocial burden for families, which hampers their psychosocial development and makes it difficult for them to adjust to normal society.[7-9] It is postulated that counseling of patients and their families has a significant positive impact on alleviating these problems.[10] Counseling sessions focusing on distress will help in alleviating the pain, burden, and anxiety issues of the parents. As a result, there is a need to quantify the burden of psychosocial problems in these families using objective psychiatric tools and to identify the factors associated with better outcomes, i.e., fewer psychosocial problems in the family.

Hence, this study was undertaken to evaluate the long-term QoL of the patients in the pediatric age group of 5–12 years who had undergone multiple corrective surgeries. The present study also aimed to assess the effect of counseling on the psychosocial development of the child in the study group.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present study was an outpatient-based, retrospective, record-based cohort study carried out at two tertiary care centers in northern India from 2020 to 2021.

The group of patients with their relatives who visited the pediatric surgery outpatient department (OPD) from 2011 to 2020 at these centers was included. Children born with congenital anomalies (namely gastrointestinal, genitourinary, and neurological anomalies) who have undergone multiple corrective surgeries (>5 surgeries or procedures such as urethral dilation, esophageal dilation, and others requiring general anesthesia and hospitalization), now in the age group of 5–12 years, were part of the study. Patients with baseline mental retardation or any pre-existing psychiatric disorder, patients who underwent minor procedures on an OPD basis, and patients with comorbidities who had associated other comorbidities and whose parents refused consent to counseling were excluded from the study.

The data for the study were extracted from the follow-up records of patients. Data related to psychosocial comorbidities manifestation were taken from the counseling record of the patient which had a pre-tested and pre-validated questionnaire adapted from the childhood behavior checklist,[11] pediatric QoL,[12] and impact of a child with congenital anomalies on parents questionnaire[13] which is attached as supplementary material . The questionnaire was completed by the parents of the patients who accompanied them to the OPD. Data were tabulated in an Excel spreadsheet and analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 25.0. The reporting checklist for the study was based on Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology cross-sectional study guidelines.[14] The ethical approval for this study was exempted as it was a retrospective record-based study.

RESULTS

A total of 1154 pediatric patients who underwent multiple surgeries for congenital anomalies were considered for inclusion in the study. Out of which 674 (58.40%) were included, and the rest 480 (41.60%) patients were excluded from the study due to incomplete records and loss to follow-up, and those who missed regular visits due to personal commitments [Flowchart 1]. The mean age of patients was 9.5 (±1.5) years. 37.0% of patients were male, 8.0% had ambiguous genitalia, and the rest 55.0% were female. 60.0% of patients belonged to the upper-middle class of the Kuppuswamy socioeconomic status scale. The average frequency of hospital visits per year was 7.3 (±1.5) times per year. The average number of surgeries or procedures that the cohort underwent was 8.3 (±2.4). The detailed demographic features of the study group are presented in Table 1.

The schematic flow of the study.
Flowchart 1:
The schematic flow of the study.
Table 1: The demographic profile of the cohort
S. No. Patient characteristics Distribution (n=674) (%)
1. Age distribution
  5–8 years 410 (60.8)
  9–12 years 264 (39.2)
2. Sex distribution
  Male 251 (37.2)
  Female 369 (54.8)
  Ambiguous genitalia 54 (8.0)
3. Educational status of patients
  Primary school 360 (53.4)
  Secondary school 314 (46.6)
4. Socioeconomic status as per the modified Kuppuswamy socioeconomic status scale
  Upper class 202 (30.0)
  Upper middle class 404 (60.0)
  Lower middle class 68 (10.0)
  Lower class 0 (0.0)
5. Number of siblings
  One or less 371 (55.0)
  More than one 303 (45.0)
6. Frequency of hospital visits per year 7.3±1.5/year
7. Number of surgeries
  <10 210 (31.0)
  10–15 334 (50.0)
  More than 15 130 (19.0)

Three major groups of patients with congenital anomalies were included in the study, namely neurological anomalies (neural tube defect and hydrocephalus), gastrointestinal anomalies (Hirschsprung’s disease and anorectal malformation), and genitourinary anomalies (hypospadias, ambiguous genitalia, and posterior urethral valve). The genitourinary group was the most common anomaly, constituting 41.0% of the total cases, followed by neural tube defects and hydrocephalus [Figure 1]. The details of various anomalies in all three groups are shown in Figures 2 and 3.

Distribution of congenital anomalies.
Figure 1:
Distribution of congenital anomalies.
Distribution of gastrointestinal anomalies.
Figure 2:
Distribution of gastrointestinal anomalies.
Distribution of genitourinary anomalies.
Figure 3:
Distribution of genitourinary anomalies.

The common problems faced by each of the patient subgroups were categorized into physical, behavioral, and family issues, and the incidences are shown in Table 2. These physical, behavioral, and family problems indirectly form part of the quality of QoL assessment. The main difference between the three groups was different physical problems, and the difficulties of the caregiver were more prevalent in the neural tube defects.

Table 2: Magnitude of the various problems
S. No. Problems Answer by the parents
GUT n=278 (%) GIT n=176 (%) Neuro n=220 (%)
1. Physical problems in the cases
  (a) Difficulty in micturition
    (i) Incomplete evacuation of urine 169 (60) 018 (10) 198 (90)
    (ii) Dribbling of urine 83 (30) 009 (05) 167 (76)
    (iii) Urinary incontinence 125 (45) 026 (15) 176 (80)
  (b) Local genitourinary infection 117 (42) 018 (10) 119 (54)
  (c) Surgical scar 189 (68) 134 (76) 163 (74)
  (d) Stoma 0 (0) 123 (70) 044 (20)
  (e) Difficulty in bowel habits 42 (15) 053 (36) 183 (84)
  (f) Paraparesis 14 (05) 035 (20) 207 (94)
  (g) Bed bound/Wheelchair bound 14 (05) 053 (30) 176 (80)
  (h) Infected wound 67 (24) 049 (28) 075 (34)
Median physical problems (10) 6 6 7
2. Behavioral problems among cases
  (a) Social withdrawal 250 (90) 141 (80) 132 (60)
  (b) Extreme negative emotions 222 (80) 134 (76) 198 (90)
  (c) Poor socialization with friends 278 (100) 172 (98) 220 (100)
  (d) Increased screen time 278 (100) 158 (90) 220 (100)
  (e) Below-average performance in class 195 (70) 141 (80) 194 (88)
  (f) History of increased bullying in class 150 (54) 084 (48) 132 (60)
  (g) Difficulty in self-care 111 (40) 081 (46) 198 (90)
  (h) Difficulty in coping with the problem 195 (70) 123 (70) 198 (90)
  (i) Conflict with the siblings 222 (80) 134 (76) 110 (50)
The median of physical problems (n=9) 6 6 7
3 Family issues
  (a) Why us? 195 (70) 141 (80) 198 (90)
  (b) Difficulty in acceptance 167 (60) 123 (70) 88 (40)
  (c) Loss of work due to hospital visits 250 (90) 123 (70) 220 (100)
  (d) Caregiver fatigue 195 (70) 120 (68) 198 (90)
  (e) Difficulty in handling the other sibling 222 (80) 141 (80) 220 (100)
  (f) Interpersonal conflict with a spouse 167 (60) 141 (80) 198 (90)
  (g) Financial constraints 222 (80) 123 (70) 176 (80)
  (h) My partner sympathizes with me 195 (70) 141 (80) 132 (60)
The median of the family issues score (n=8) 5 4 6
4. The social network of the family
  (a) Do my friends support me? 250 (90) 141 (80) 132 (60)
  (b) My friends support me with practical things 195 (70) 120 (68) 88 (40)
  (c) I can share my thoughts with friends 222 (80) 123 (70) 154 (70)
Median social network score (n=3) 2 2 2
5. State of mind of parents
  (a) I feel sad 195 (70) 106 (60) 154 (70)
  (b) I feel guilty 150 (54) 081 (46) 088 (40)
  (c) I feel angry 167 (60) 128 (68) 132 (60)
  (d) I wonder whether I am to blame for my child’s condition 42 (15) 053 (30) 110 (50)
Median of the state of parents’ score (n=4) 2 2 3
6. Child acceptance by the parents
  (a) My child does not fit into my life 195 (80) 081 (46) 88 (40)
  (b) My child is not welcome in the family 150 (54) 053 (30) 132 (60)
  (c) I am not happy with my child 167 (60) 053 (30) 066 (30)
  (d) I wish my child had never been born 014 (05) 049 (28) 154 (70)
Median child acceptance score (n=4) 2 2 3
7. Fear and anxiety among the caregivers
  (a) My child faces difficulties in life 195 (70) 136 (76) 176 (80)
  (b) I expect my child will be able to function well 150 (54) 141 (80) 66 (30)
  (c) I wonder whether my child will ever be healthy 125 (45) 053 (30) 189 (86)
  (d) I am very anxious about the tests done on my child 222 (80) 141 (80) 198 (90)
  (e) My child is facing a difficult period 250 (90) 158 (90) 198 (90)
  (f) My child is the same as other children 150 (54) 106 (60) 044 (20)
  (g) I fear the child’s expectations for the future 167 (60) 113 (64) 211 (96)
  (h) My child is handicapped 195 (70) 77 (44) 154 (70)
  (i) I feel that I could not do enough for my child 42 (15) 53 (30) 88 (40)
  (j) My child would have a normal life later 67 (24) 70 (40) 22 (10)
Median fear and anxiety score (n=10) 7 6 8
8. Interaction with the doctors, counselors, and nurses
  (a) Does your doctor and the nurses listen to your problem? 250 (90) 141 (80) 163 (74)
  (b) Are you satisfied with the time provided by the doctors, counselors, and nurses 250 (90) 141 (80) 163 (74)
Median of the score of interaction with the doctors, counselors, and nurses (n=2) 2 2 2
Total of median score (n=50) 32 30 38

GIT: Gastrointestinal tract, GUT: Genitorinary

The median scores on the questionnaire were 38 for the neural tube defect group, 32 for the genitourinary group, and 30 for the gastrointestinal group. The detailed distribution of the problem encountered is shown in Table 2. 73.29% of cases received counseling sessions (i.e., >4 counseling sessions), which was defined as adequate.

The patients were divided into two subgroups based on the median of the score on the questionnaire, i.e., 34. The characteristics of the two groups were compared using the Chi-square test to identify favorable and adverse factors. The factors significantly associated with fewer psychosocial issues with caregivers and patients were a lesser number of OPD visits, adequate counseling (defined by >4 counseling sessions), lower number of corrective surgeries (<10), and early starting of the counseling of patients and family (i.e., when child age is between 5 and 7 years) in genitourinary and gastrointestinal anomalies group as compared to neural tube defects. The ambiguous genitalia children were found to have significantly higher amounts of physical, psychosocial, and behavioral issues as compared to the kids with normal genitalia. Details of the factors associated are depicted in Table 3.

Table 3: Factors associated with better psychosocial adaptation among the cases (i.e., median score<34)
S. No. Variables (n) Median score<34 (n) Median score>34 (n) P-value
1. Sex (n)
  (a) Other sex 330 290 0.0030*
  (b) Ambiguous genitalia 14 40
2. Multiple OPD
  (a) Visits>4/year (n) 190 284 0.0004*
  (b) Visits<4/year (n) 110 90
3. Number of surgeries done surgeries
  (a) <10 190 210 <0.0001
  (b) >10 75 199
4. Age of starting counseling in years
  (a) 5–7 years 200 240 <0.0001
  (b) 8–12 years 50 184
5. Site of surgery
  (a) Other surgery 236 218 <0.0001
  (b) Neural tube defect and hydrocephalus 60 160
6. Adequacy of counseling sessions
  (a) >4 sessions/year for at least 3 years 324 170 <0.00001
  (b) Inadequate counseling (less than adequate) 80 100

The statistical tool used to find p value was Chi square test and Mann Whitney U test. *P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. OPD: Outpatient department

DISCUSSION

The present study was an OPD-based, retrospective, record-based cohort study carried out at two centers in Northern India, with a sample size of 674 This study is unique in the sense that the cohort of patients had a long follow-up period between 2011 and 2020 and it comprised three major groups of patients with congenital anomalies, namely neural tube defects, genitourinary, and gastrointestinal anomalies. There are only a handful of studies on this matter to date, but none of these have included such a wide cohort of the pediatric population with congenital anomalies, assessing the psychosocial burden among these patients.

Demographic profile of the cohort

In our study, the mean age of the cases was 9.5 (±1.5) years, with a female preponderance. It was higher than the World Health Organization data.[15] There is a male preponderance in the pediatric surgery OPD.[16] Furthermore, there were 8% of the cases with ambiguous genitalia, which is comparable with the general population, higher than the general population, which is 1 in 5000 births.[17]

Socioeconomic status has a significant impact on the follow-up psychosocial behavior of the family; most of the patients in our study belonged to the upper-middle class of the Kuppuswamy socioeconomic status scale. The present study was done in a government hospital setting where the medication, surgery follow-up, and counseling all the facilities were free. Hence, probably, the psychosocial comorbidities in the present study might be lower than the actual population in India, and the socioeconomic factors have less impact on the study among the study population. Furthermore, 45.0% of the cases had >1 sibling. This has an impact in the form that families with a higher number of siblings have less time with their parents for the unaffected child.

The most common congenital anomaly in our cohort was a genitourinary anomaly, followed by neural tube defects and hydrocephalus and then gastrointestinal anomalies while the epidemiological study of pediatric congenital anomaly by Agarwal et al. in 2017 found in their cohort that the most common anomaly was neural tube defects among 24.3% cases followed by gastrointestinal abnormality in the form of anorectal malformation (20.7%), tracheoesophageal fistula.[16]

Psychosocial, behavioral, and family problems

The most common behavioral problem encountered in these cases was poor socialization, increased screen time (use of television, mobile phone, and gaming consoles), and extreme negative emotions. The most common family problem encountered was the loss of work due to hospitalization and difficulty in handling the siblings. Similar findings have been listed in the study by Dwyer et al.[18] The caregiver fatigue, poor acceptance of the child in society, and fear and anxiety among the parents were the other psychosocial problems encountered in these patients and their families.

Factors associated with better psychosocial and behavioral development of children

In this study, the cohort of patients was subclassified into two groups based on the median score of psychosocial questionnaires. Out of the two groups, the group with lower scores had better psychosocial and behavior outcomes as compared to the other group with higher scores. P-values were calculated using the Chi-square test to find the factors associated with better psychosocial development and lower behavioral and family outcomes.

We found that the factors significantly associated with good psychosocial outcomes with families and patients were normal genitalia as compared to ambiguous genitalia, a lesser number of OPD visits, a lower number of corrective surgeries (<10 as it was the median number of surgeries among the study group), genitourinary, and gastrointestinal tract anomalies as compared to neural tube defects.

We also found an adequate number of counseling sessions, which is defined as more than four counseling sessions (the median number of counseling sessions for the study group). It has also been recommended by Fost that starting counseling at an early age, between 5 and 7 years, is associated with better outcomes in terms of psychosocial and behavioral development, as well as fewer family issues.[19] Hence, it is recommended that patients with congenital anomalies who have undergone or are expected to undergo multiple corrective surgeries must be counseled adequately, and counseling of patients and their families must begin early in life so that there is better adaptation to psychosocial stress. There are very limited studies, with several studies assessing the QoL among patients with congenital anomalies undergoing the surgeries; hence, limited comparison with the other studies could be done.

Limitations of the study

The present study included cases with neural tube defects and gastrointestinal and genitourinary surgery patients. However, other congenital anomalies such as pectus excavatum, cleft lip, and cleft palate, which have a significant impact on the psychosocial development of the child and may benefit from the concept of early counseling being part of holistic care, were not part of this study. Furthermore, the detailed issues of children with ambiguous genitalia were not separately discussed in this study.

Recommendation and strength of the study

This study quantifies the psycho-social burden associated with multiple corrective surgeries among children, which is the first of its kind of study from the Asian region. In this study, we found that repetitive counseling has fewer psycho-social comorbidity; hence, it is recommended to be included in the institutional protocol of the pediatric surgery centers. We also recommend conducting further prospective follow-up studies with a larger sample size and examining multiple other comorbidities.

CONCLUSION

Multiple corrective surgeries in pediatric patients with congenital anomalies during their formative years are associated with a significant number of psychosocial problems in these children. An adequate number of appropriately planned counseling sessions started early on in the treatment of these patients is associated with lower psychosocial problems and better adaptation by these patients, their siblings, and their caregivers. The current study emphasizes the importance of counseling as an integral part of the treatment plan for this subset of patients.

Author contributions:

All authors have equally contributed towards concept design, literature search, manuscript preparation, manuscript editing, and manuscript review.

Ethical approval:

Institutional review board is not required as it is a retrospective study.

Declaration of patient consent:

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.

Conflicts of interest:

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.

References

  1. , , , , . The effect of multiple surgeries on psychosocial outcomes in pediatric patients: A scoping review. Ann Plastic Surg. 2020;85:574-83.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , et al. The impact of general anesthesia on child development and school performance: A population-based study. Paediatr Anaesth. 2018;28:528-36.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , . Paediatric day surgery: Impact on Hong Kong Chinese children and their parents. J Clin Nurs. 2003;12:882-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. . Preparing children for surgery-an integrative research review. AORN J. 2000;71:334-43.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , . Erikson's Stages of Psychosocial Development In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK556096/ [Last accessed 2025 May 15]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. . A hospital play program: Helping children with serious illness. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1976;46:416-24.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. . Minimizing pediatric healthcare-induced anxiety and trauma. World J Clin Pediatr. 2016;5:143-50.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , . Psychoeducational preparation of children for surgery: The importance of parental involvement. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;65:34-41.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. , . A therapeutic play group for hospitalized children with cancer. J Psychosoc Oncol. 1985;3:23-37.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , et al. Psychological therapies for anxiety and depression in children and adolescents with long-term physical conditions. Cochrane Database Systematic Rev. 2018;12:CD012488.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. , . Child behavior checklist (CBCL) brief description. Available from: https://www.aseba.org [Last accessed 2022 September 25]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. . Available from: https://www.corc.uk.net/outcome-experience-measures/paediatric-quality-of-life-pedsql [Last accessed 2022 September 25]
  13. , , , , , . Impact of a child with congenital anomalies on parents (ICCAP) questionnaire; a psychometric analysis. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008;6:102.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , , et al. A strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): Are HE4 and CA 125 suitable to detect a Paget disease of the vulva? Medicine (Baltimore). 2021;100:e24485.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Congenital anomalies. Available from: https://www.who.int/health-topics/congenital-anomalies#tab=tab_1 [Last accessed 2022 September 25]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , . Spectrum of congenital anomalies among surgical patients at a tertiary care centre over 4 years. Int J Pediatr. 2017;2017:4174573.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , , , et al. Changing patterns of congenital anomalies over ten years in a single neonatal intensive care unit. Korean J Perinatol. 2013;24:11-9.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , . Developmental outcomes and physical activity behaviour in children post major surgery: an observational study. BMC Pediatr. 2016;16:123.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. . Counseling families who have a child with a severe congenital anomaly. Pediatrics. 1981;67:321-4.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections