Translate this page into:
Silent emergence of Mycoplasma pneumonia from 2022 to 2024

*Corresponding author: Senthilraja Ramalingam, Department of Molecular Biology, Microbiological Laboratory, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. serratiasenthil@gmail.com
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
How to cite this article: Natarajan A, Ramalingam S, Ganapathy S, Kanchepalli J, Manasa S, Mariappa M. Silent emergence of Mycoplasma pneumonia from 2022 to 2024. Med India. 2025;4:23-7. doi: 10.25259/MEDINDIA_11_2025
Abstract
Objectives:
Community-acquired pneumonia has been associated with increased morbidity and death, and it poses a serious threat to public health worldwide. Coughing and sneezing can spread aerosols of the Mycoplasma pneumoniae bacterium; infections are normally self-limiting and mild, but they may turn into serious or even life-threatening diseases in some individuals. Increased risk of M. pneumoniae in the post-COVID-19 situation.
Materials and Methods:
Retrospective research on patients infected with M. pneumoniae, including polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis from January 2022 to December 2024 at Mani Microbiological Laboratory Pvt Ltd. A total of 19242 cases were requested for respiratory tract illness. Fast track diagnosis - respiratory pathogen identification with the TaqMan probe test. Amplification was carried out using Rotor-Gene Q 5 plex and MIC PCR. The results analyzed were documented.
Results:
Over 790/19242 cases tested positive for M. pneumoniae, of which 436 individuals were male, and 354 individuals were female. In December, 201 (24%) individuals were infected with M. pneumoniae; 122 individuals were infected in the notifiable age group (2–4) as reported by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention. pre-COVID-19 and during the COVID-19 pandemic situation from 2018–2021, including (62/1156) the M. pneumoniae-infected individuals.
Conclusion:
In this study, an elevated number of young children were infected with M. pneumonia, leading to a high risk; children between the ages of 2-4 were infected in high numbers and were considered to be a notable one. The salient emergence of M. pneumoniae in the Southern parts of India was recorded in this study.
Keywords
Emergence
India
Infection
Mycoplasma pneumonia
Real-time polymerase chain reaction
INTRODUCTION
Mycoplasma pneumoniae is an atypical bacterium that causes infections, including acute respiratory infections, pharyngitis, tracheobronchitis, wheezing, and pneumonia. Among these, tracheobronchitis (a chest cold) is the most common, while pneumonia (a lung infection) is less common,[1] especially in children aged 5–15 years.[2] During the pandemic, the number of cases detected worldwide decreased significantly. Whereas the revival of virtually all respiratory-related diseases began slowly in 2021, the prevalence of M. pneumoniae stayed very low through June 2023, when a significant upsurge of cases was documented worldwide.[3]
In Taiwan, during the COVID-19 pandemic, all other notifiable diseases (Influenza, invasive pneumococcal disease [IPD], pertussis, and enterovirus) were significantly decreased. The emergence of M. pneumoniae, a call of immune debt among individuals, results resurgence of several infectious diseases, leading to large epidemics in post-pandemic areas. The pandemic has led to a shift in both the disease burden and seasonality of infectious diseases. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is most prevalent during the rainy season in subtropical and tropical regions, and its peak incidence occurs during winter in temperate regions. Out-of-season RSV resurgences were reported in both the southern and northern hemispheres following a mild winter during the COVID-19 pandemic.[4] Metagenomic analysis of M. pneumoniae shows EC1 in P1-1 and EC2 (Enzyme Comission number) in P1-2; since 2010, EC1 has been isolated throughout Asian countries; in contrast, EC2 emerged first in 2019 in Taiwan. EC2 shows resistance to macrolides due to a mutation in A2063G of the 23S ribosomal RNA.[5] Countries such as Denmark, the Netherlands, France, and Spain also faced a rapid increase in M. pneumoniae at the end of 2023.[6-9]
Central nervous system (CNS) abnormalities and consequences are most typically observed and documented in M. pneumoniae episodes. Patients with M. pneumoniae illness may experience varied degrees of neurological problems at a rate of roughly 6–7%.[3] Neurological symptoms include encephalitis, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, transverse myelitis, Guillain–Barré syndrome, and thromboembolic stroke. The duration between the onset of pulmonary and neurological symptoms ranges from 2 to 14 days. More than 80% of individuals with CNS abnormalities have a concurrent respiratory infection.[10-12]
The introduction of non-pharmaceutical interventions against COVID-19 led to a rapid decline in outbreaks and a significant decrease in M pneumoniae incidence globally. In contrast to the pre-pandemic prevalence of M pneumoniae.[2] implementing non-pharmaceutical.The data suggest that maintaining NPIs, such as hand hygiene and respiratory etiquette, after COVID-19 helped prevent M. pneumoniae transmission.[13,14]
Macrolide resistance in M. pneumoniae, which has just one ribosomal operon, is determined by an antibiotic-targeting ribosomal mutation.[15] There is no literature available on the natural resistance of tetracycline in M. pneumoniae; minocycline and doxycycline have shown better performance against macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae.[16]
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A retrospective study was conducted using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis between January 2022 and December 2024 at Mani Microbiological Laboratory Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, India, to investigate the delayed re-emergence of M. pneumoniae in the post-COVID-19 period. Over 19242 cases requested for respiratory tract infection test, it includes Influenza A, H1N1, Influenza B, Rhinovirus, Coronavirus NL63, Coronavirus 229E, Coronavirus oc43, Coronavirus HKU1, Parainfluenza 1-4, Bocavirus, Human Metapneumovirus A/B, M. pneumoniae, RSV A/B, Adenovirus, Enterovirus, Parechovirus, Cytomegalovirus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Chlamydia pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Haemophilus influenzae type B, Pan-Fungal DNA with respiratory samples of throat and nasopharyngeal swab, sputum, endotracheal secretion (ET) and bronchoalveolar lavages (BAL). For multiplex, fast-track diagnosis of respiratory pathogens using the TaqMan probe assay, all specimens were collected according to routine standards from hospitals and laboratories.
Collected specimens were pre-treated, as per the samples type before extraction; includes n = 14,795 (throat and NP swab), n = 1219 (throat swab), n = 2047 (nasal swab), n = 245 (sputum), n = 135 (ET secretion), n = 485 (BAL fluid), n = 26 (BAL aspirate), n = 163 (pleural fluid, n = 4 (CSF), n = 71 (ET aspirate), n = 23 (BAL wash), n = 11 (lung biopsy), n = 8 (Pus), n = 6 (gastric fluid), n = 2 (lung abscess), n = 1 (splenic granuloma aspiration), and n = 1 (pericardial fluid).
Nucleic acid extraction
Pre-processing of the samples may vary based on the sample type, nature, and viscosity; however, there is no need for pre-processing with the VTM swabs. Total nucleic acid extraction was performed using either Qia-amp RNA and DNA kit (Manual) or Qia-symphony (Automated) (Qiagen, Germany) according to the manufacture’s protocol, with spin column–solid phase extraction method and an elution of 80 µL for all types of specimens and stored in −20° C prior to use or −80°C for long time storage.
Multiplex real-time PCR (RT-PCR) analysis
PCR was performed with the final volume of 25 µL containing 12.5 µL 2x RT-PCR buffer, 1 µL 25x RT-PCR enzyme mix (Fast-track master mix), 1.5 µL of primer-probe mix, and 10 µL of extracted elute/positive control/negative control. Amplification was performed in MIC PCR (Magnetic induction cycler - Bio Molecular Systems, Australia); Rotor-Gene Q MDx 5plex HRM (Qiagen, Germany); as follows reverse transcription activation at 42°C for 15 min; initial denaturation at 94°C for 3 min followed by 40 cycles of 94°C for 8 s, 60°C for 34 s. TaqMan probe with oligonucleotide and quencher; if the quencher is cleaved, the fluorophores illuminate the signal for amplification. Positives were considered a yield with a cycle threshold (Ct) <40. All the samples were tested, and the results were interpreted and documented.
RESULTS
Over 19,242 enrolments, M. pneumoniae DNA was detected in 790 (4.1%) individuals with severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) illness. In 2022, 6/3990 (0.15%) individuals were infected with M. pneumoniae; followed by 2023, 85/8240 (1.03%) had an infection. In the present year, 2024, the positivity rate has increased to 699/7012 (9.96%), higher than the previous year [Table 1]. In terms of patient gender, males (436/790, 55.18%) holds to be the increased M. pneumoniae cases; females (354/790, 44.8%) cases; a shrink ratio of (M/F) were (11:9) [Figure 1]. However, the infection of M. pneumoniae in the children aged 6–10 seems an elevated positive were noted; followed by 1–5 years age group had second most critically infected; 0th day 3576 infants tested and turn out with 49 positives; 11–5 years had 100 (12.7%) infected children. Seventeen positive cases were observed among individuals aged 16–20 years. The overall percentage of positivity observed between the years 2022 and 2024 along with M. pneumonia are as follows: >10% of positivity was observed in RSV A/B, Rhinovirus and Adenovirus; >5% of positivity in Influenza A, B, Parainfluenza 1-4, HMPV and Streptococcus pneumonia; 1-5% positivity in Enterovirus, H1N1, Bocavirus, Parechovirus, Staphylococcus aureus, CMV and panfungal; <1% positivity in Coronovirus 229E, OC43, NL63 and Haemophilus influenza type B [Table 2].

- Gender-wise distribution of Mycoplasma pneumoniae.
Years | Tested | Positive | % of positives |
---|---|---|---|
2022 | 3990 | 6 | 0.15 |
2023 | 8240 | 85 | 1.03 |
2024 | 7012 | 699 | 9.96 |
Pathogens | % of positivity |
---|---|
Respiratory syncytial virus A/B | 13.1 |
Rhinovirus | 12.7 |
Adeno virus | 10.7 |
Influenza A | 8.7 |
Influenza B | 7.5 |
Parainfluenza 1-4 | 7.1 |
Human Metapneumovirus A/B | 5.9 |
Streptococcus pneumoniae | 5.2 |
Pan-Fungal DNA | 4.8 |
H1N1 | 4.4 |
Enterovirus | 4.3 |
Bocavirus | 3.6 |
Parechovirus | 3.2 |
Staphylococcus aureus | 3.2 |
Cytomegalovirus | 2.8 |
Coronavirus NL63 | 0.8 |
Coronavirus 229E | 0.8 |
Coronavirus oc43 | 0.8 |
Haemophilus influenzae type B | 0.4 |
Monthly distribution of pneumonia infection by M. pneumoniae
The positivity rate of M. pneumoniae in 2022–2023 increased 14-fold; in 2023–2024 nearly 8.2-fold; it has been gradually increasing in-between the years 2022 and 2024 (0.15–9.96% positives). In 2024 the data were as follows: January (12/583), February (20/513), March (10/486), April (15/267), May (10/176), June (7/211), July (23/427), August (41/816), September (84/1133), October (120/761), November (156/800), and December (201/838). The detection of M. pneumoniae among children increased consistently from July 2024 to December 2024. Among the tested, 24% of individuals were infected (December–2024) [Figure 2].

- Month-wise distribution of Mycoplasma pneumoniae.
M. pneumoniae in different age groups in the population
In 2022, there were six positives among 0th-day infants, with two cases; 1–5-year-olds had two cases, and 6–10-year-olds had one case. In 2023, 85 positives including 0th day 10 infants detected positives; 1–5 years (20 cases), 6–10 years (32 cases), 11–15 years (6 cases), 21–25 years (one case), 31–35 years (two cases), 36–40 years (one case), 41–45 years (one case), 46–50 years (one case), 51–55 years (one case), 56–60 years (four cases), 66–70 years (two cases), 71–75 years (one case), 76–80 years (two cases), and 91-years-old (one case). In 2024, 0th day 37 infants with M. pneumoniae; 1–5 years (197 cases), 6–10 years (275 cases), 11–15 years (93 cases), 16–20 years (17 cases), 21–25 years (six cases), 26–30 years (seven cases), 31–35 years (16 cases), 36–40 years(13 cases), 41–45 years (five cases), 46–50 years (five cases), 51–55 years (five cases), 56– 60 years (seven cases), 61–65 years (ten cases), 66–70 years (one case), 76–80 years (four cases), and 86–90 years (one case). The retrospective data analyzed from pre-COVID-19 and during the COVID-19 pandemic period, from 2018 to 2021, include 62/1156 M. pneumoniae-infected individuals [Figure 3].

- Age-wise distribution of Mycoplasma pneumoniae.
Detection of M. pneumoniae DNA in notable age people
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, M. pneumoniae positives in the age group 2–4 were notifiable because, in the past, there was no record of increased positives in that age group; here, 122 (15.4%) positives were observed out of the 790 cases. Of which, 65 cases involved male children, and 57 involved female children who tested positive.
DISCUSSION
CAP has been correlated with elevated morbidity & mortality, and it poses significant risks to public health worldwide. Coughing and sneezing can distribute aerosols containing M. pneumoniae. It yields infections in both the upper and lower respiratory tracts, and the clinical signs are typically nonspecific. Tracheobronchitis is the most prevalent lower respiratory infection, followed by pharyngitis. Infections of the upper respiratory tract caused by M. pneumoniae. M. pneumoniae infections are typically self-limiting and mild, but they can progress to become serious or even life-threatening in some individuals M. pneumoniae has been causally associated with 40% of community-acquired pneumonia events in children below the age of five, where lower respiratory tract infections are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality.[17,18]
Shin et al. observed the characteristics of M. pneumoniae in Korea (2020) with over 16.50% of infected cases and 69.67% of isolates were macrolide resistant in the epidemic period from 2019 to 2022; 0.86% of M. pneumoniae-positive instances had concurrent infections with non-normal floral pathogenic strains, including 158 Chlamydia pneumoniae, 23 Bordetella pertussis/parapertussis, and 2 Legionella pneumophila.[19] Meyer et al. (2021) reported a differentiation of M. pneumoniae positive rates before the implementation of NPIs in India at 19/205 and after implementation at 16/153.[20] According to Chaudhry et al., a study conducted in New Delhi found that 3.9% of 429 individuals tested positive for M. pneumoniae culture, with a 25.6% positive rate for immunoglobulin G and immunoglobulin M (IgM).[21] According to Farooqui et al., the top five states contributing to India’s pneumonia burden were Uttar Pradesh (27,785/1,33,167), Bihar (23,202/91,578), Madhya Pradesh (13,043/52,250), Rajasthan (11,889/43,911), and Jharkhand (6,296/28,969).[22 ] In 2024, over 88.5% of infected individuals were under the age of 5 years; 11.5% were 5–12 years old; 41.02% had wheezing; 53.8% had coryza; 5.12% had chest pain; there was no CNS/cardiovascular infection in the tested individuals.[23] The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay IgM for M. pneumoniae was positive in 33 (22%) instances, although only 15 (10%) patients showed positive amplification in PCR. Culturing was also undertaken on all of the samples; however, none of them were observed to be positive.[24]
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, we found a higher prevalence of M. pneumoniae infection in children under the age of five years compared to adults. This data features the current status of the Mycoplasma pneumonia burden in the southern parts of India. Increasing access to RT-PCR-based molecular detection of the pathogen could facilitate a definitive diagnosis. The timely identification of M. pneumonia infection could reduce complications, including extrapulmonary manifestations, and could guide clinicians in the use of targeted therapy.
Acknowledgments:
The authors thank Dr. Shakeera Banu and Dr Helen Hencida for their contributions.
Author contributions:
All authors contributed equally to the collection of data, data analysis, review of literature, writing of the manuscript, correction, and development of the drafted initial version of the manuscript.
Ethical approval:
Institutional Review Board approval is not required, as this study involves only a retrospective analysis of anonymous data; therefore, ethical clearance is not applicable.
Declaration of patient consent:
Patient’s consent not required as there are no patients in this study.
Conflicts of interest:
There are no conflicts of interest.
Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:
The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.
Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.
References
- Mycoplasma pneumoniae among hospitalized patients with acute respiratory tract infections in an Indian tertiary care hospital: an underreported health problem. Microbiol Spectr. 2022;10:e0158922.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mycoplasma pneumoniae and its role as a human pathogen. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004;17:697-728.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mycoplasma pneumoniae delayed re-emergence after COVID-19 pandemic restrictions. Lancet Microbe. 2024;5:E100-1.
- [Google Scholar]
- Changing epidemic patterns of infectious diseases during and after COVID-19 pandemic in Taiwan. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2024;57:685-90.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Resurgence of Mycoplasma pneumonia by macrolide-resistant epidemic clones in China. Lancet Microbe. 2024;5:e515.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mycoplasma pneumoniae epidemic in Denmark, October to December, 2023. Euro Surveill. 2024;29:2300707.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Increased incidence of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections and hospital admissions in the Netherlands, November to December 2023. Euro Surveill. 2024;29:2300724.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Outbreak of Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in hospitalized patients: Who is concerned? Nord Franche-Comté hospital, France, 2023-2024. Epidemiol Infect. 2024;152:e46.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mycoplasma pneumoniae at the rise not only in China: rapid increase of Mycoplasma pneumoniae cases also in Spain. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2024;13:2332680.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pediatric encephalitis: What is the role of Mycoplasma pneumoniae? Pediatrics. 2007;120:305-13.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection with neurologic complications. Ital J Pediatr. 2015;41:A67.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Neurological manifestations of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection in hospitalized children and their long-term follow-up. Neuropediatrics. 2016;47:308-17.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Diagnostic delays among COVID-19 patients with a second concurrent diagnosis. J Hosp Med. 2023;18:321-8.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Post COVID-19 Pandemic increased detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in adults admitted to the intensive care. J Clin Med. 2024;13:3443.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mechanisms of drug resistance in Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Curr Drug Targets Infect Disord. 2005;5:263-71.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Overview of antimicrobial options for Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia: focus on macrolide resistance. Clin Respir J. 2017;11:419-29.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections: Pathogenesis and vaccine development. Pathogens. 2021;10:119.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Exploring the pathogenetic mechanisms of Mycoplasma pneumoniae (review) Exp Ther Med. 2024;28:271.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Characteristics of the Mycoplasma pneumoniae epidemic from 2019 to 2020 in Korea: Macrolide resistance and co-infection trends. Antibiotics (Basel). 2023;12:1623.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mycoplasma pneumoniae detections before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: Results of a global survey, 2017 to 2021. Euro Surveill. 2022;27:2100746.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Legionella pneumophila in patients having community-acquired pneumonia: A multicentric study from New Delhi, India. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017;97:1710-6.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burden of severe pneumonia, pneumococcal pneumonia and pneumonia deaths in Indian states: Modelling based estimates. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0129191.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mycoplasma pneumoniae among children hospitalized in a tertiary hospital with community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2025;53:100781.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Association of Mycoplasma pneumoniae and asthma among Indian children. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2009;56:25-31.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]